If you are looking for a child custody lawyer or family lawyer in Pakistan, you may contact Jamila Law Associates. Appearance through an agent is legally permissible under S. 18 of the W.P. Family Courts Act, 1964. Section 18 of the Family Courts Act, 1964 empowers the court to permit any person required to appear before the Family Court to be represented by an authorized agent or appoint child custody lawyeror family lawyer in Pakistan.
The occasion for the exercise of power under this would arise only if it is showed that any requires any person of the provisions of the Family Courts Act, 1964, to appear before the court and that person being a pardanashin wishes to appoint an authorized agent. However, the provisions of Section 18 do not in any manner take away the right of a counsel to appear and act on behalf of his client.
Such a right is recognized by Section 22 of the Legal Practitioners and Bar Council Act, 1973. The record revealed that the petitioner’s application was rejected because she could not prove her ailment. Section 18 of the Family Courts Act, 1964 permitted a Pardanasheen lady to represent a duly authorized child custody lawyer or family lawyer in Pakistan. When a Pardanasheen lady could be represented before the court through her authorized agent, it could impose no embargo on recording her statement through her exceptional attorney. Family Court was legally required to have registered her message through her excellent attorney. The petitioner’s appearance in other proceedings, held, would not debar her to seek such relief in the present proceedings.
Family Lawyer in Pakistan:
High Court set aside impugned order directing the Family Court to proceed with the case through child custody lawyer or family lawyer in Pakistan while recording the petitioner’s statement through her agent. The constitutional petition was allowed accordingly. Provisions of S. 18 of West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, were meant for such a category of cases where spouses’ appearance was essential, enabling. It also included a mandatory provision of reconciliation in the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964.
Recovery of dowry:
Recovery of dowry articles was a civil liability contained in the Schedule of West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964. Provisions of S. 18 of West Pakistan Family Court Act, 1964, were enabling conditions, and it could not deprive the husband of defending the suit against him through his child custody lawyer or family lawyer in Pakistan. High Court declined to interfere in concurrent orders passed by both the courts below, whereby the application filed by the wife was dismissed. Respondent against whom suit of maintenance was field being abroad could not appear in the court family Court proceeds to pass ex parte decree which was got set aside by respondent through his attorney on filing written statement by the attorney family Court, proceeded to hold that the written notice filed through child custody lawyer or family lawyer in Pakistan did not deserve consideration and rejected the same. It cannot deprive held respondent of his right to defend the suit against him through his attorney.